Methodological Assurance and Innovation | Research at the EPiCSS group
Valid measures of health and disease are requirements for methodologically sound research. The EPiCSS research group works to develop and validate research instruments such as mental health surveys, to validate registered diagnoses against complete medical records. As well as to develop better measures of the burden of disease to evaluate the health of populations and success of public health interventions.
Developing Research Instruments
Contact: Andreas Lundin
Valid and reliable measurement is a prerequisite for unbiased research results. Public health surveys typically rely on brief screening scales, developed in clinical settings, to measure illness in the general population.
In this project, we have validated several psychiatric scales in general population samples in Stockholm County, which is our primary research setting.
The validity of the symptom checklist depression and anxiety subscales: A general population study in Sweden.
Lundin A, Hallgren M, Forsell Y
J Affect Disord 2015 Sep;183():247-52
Testing the Discriminant and Convergent Validity of the World Health Organization Six-Item Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale Screener Using the Stockholm Public Health Cohort.
Lundin A, Kosidou K, Dalman C
J Atten Disord 2019 Aug;23(10):1170-1177
Discriminant validity of the 12-item version of the general health questionnaire in a Swedish case-control study.
Lundin A, Åhs J, Åsbring N, Kosidou K, Dal H, Tinghög P, et al
Nord J Psychiatry 2017 Apr;71(3):171-179
Validity of the 12-item version of the General Health Questionnaire in detecting depression in the general population.
Lundin A, Hallgren M, Theobald H, Hellgren C, Torgén M
Public Health 2016 Jul;136():66-74
The use of alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in detecting alcohol use disorder and risk drinking in the general population: validation of AUDIT using schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry.
Lundin A, Hallgren M, Balliu N, Forsell Y
Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 2015 Jan;39(1):158-65
Improving public health monitoring by estimating the burden of disease
Using data from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) project, the group is estimating the national burden of disease in Sweden and the importance of risk factors.
Research is ongoing on how to include socioeconomic position as an additional risk factor, not previously included in the GBD list. Collaboration with experts in Nordic countries as well as a network chaired by WHO Europe will enable comparison between countries and over time.
Data is continuously being collected from various Swedish sources, and updated to feed into the database hosted by the Institute of Health and Metrics in Seattle, USA, with which we have strong collaboration. A subnational study has been made comparing Stockholm County with the rest of Sweden, and ongoing work is planned to cover all Swedish County councils.
In collaboration with Public Health England we plan to develop analyses of local variation taking into account social position.
Hälsoutvecklingen I Stockholm bättre än i övriga landet. Jämförelse av hälsoläget utifrån globala sjukdomsbördeprojektet [Health progress in Stockholm is better compared to the rest of Sweden].
Agardh EE, Danielsson AK, Guban P, Lager A, Rabiee R, Allebeck P. Läkartidningen. 2018;115:EWWH.
Measuring progress and projecting attainment on the basis of past trends of the health-related Sustainable Development Goals in 188 countries: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016.
Lancet 2017 Sep;390(10100):1423-1459
Den globala sjukdomsbördan har både minskat och ökat. Uppdatering av det globala sjukdomsbördeprojektet är nu klar. [The global burden of disease has both decreased and increased. The update of the global disease burden project is now complete].
Allebeck P, Agardh EE. Läkartidningen. 2017;114:ED34.